(Deep Breath)….Ok…Let’s do this.
I believe there’s a crisis of masculinity in the world. In certain Arab countries the crisis is caused by rich men marrying multiple wives. This causes displacement of men who can’t get a wife, which in turn triggers serious mental stress. The same stress occurs in China and India where too many girls were aborted for cultural reasons. In the west “access” to women and sexual activities is constrained by variants of Feminism causes women being “allowed” to say no to men, have alternatives to being culturally compelled to entering relationships with men (because they have income). In all cases the relative and contextual lack of access to sex with women causes men mental stress. I find this phenomenon extremely fascinating. I believe this is going to become a bigger stress factor and the stress will increasingly result in types of violence.
“The Proud Boys”
Why the Alt-Right Thinks Porn is a Jewish Conspiracy
“It’s not weird,” someone assured him. In fact, this someone added, there’s “a conspiracy from sinister guys at the top” to pornify popular culture, in order to get young boys so addicted to pornographic images that they develop “bad social skills” and are too weak and distracted to resist the elites in power. “Looks like it worked,” agreed another user, who then pressed ENTER 144 times and posted a gif of a fly rubbing its front legs together, with a hook-nosed, yarmulked Jewish caricature photoshopped on its head. How did this bodybuilding forum go from Lola Bunny screenshots to anti-Semitic memes in less than 24 hours? Well, it turns out that despite the stereotype that alt-righters spend hours in their parents’ basements watching tentacle hentai, many of them are theoretically anti-porn. More specifically, they believe porn is a Jewish conspiracy to weaken white men and, if all goes according to plan, destroy Western civilization. (Honestly, this isn’t that different from how a lot of mainstream commentators talk about porn — but more on that later.)
I became aware of the alt-right theory of smut on February 11, 2018, the day after New York Times columnist Ross Douthat called for an outright ban on pornography. A conservative writer I follow on Twitter agreed with Douthat, and I replied with some practical concerns about what might happen if the porn industry became an unregulated black market.
A definitive guide to Incels Part Three: the history of Incel
The incel forums of today are obsessed with purity, gatekeeping, and paranoia. There are constant fears that they are being infiltrated by outsiders who wish to undermine them and paint them in a bad light. Moreover, they engage in periodic disputes over who is and is not a truecel, and who is a fakecel or actually volcel (voluntarily celibate). There is a general consensus that not only do you have to be a virgin, you also have to be ugly enough or disadvantaged enough in some other way that you could not find sex, despite wanting to. Some incels will even say that someone has to have “approached” women a significant number of times and been rejected every time in order to be truly incel. Women are strictly forbidden from the community, as all women are capable of having sex if they truly want to.
The disadvantage of being male is hard to quantify, Men have a more intense role to play. This takes 8 yrs off their life. For million of men who can’t find a mate, take off another 8 yrs. Women are accepted into society no matter what. Guys have to earn a place in society by getting a job in an economy where most jobs are more suited to females. Females are not shy and have much less social anxiety. They basically are given a free pass. This was fine in the days when women did not have jobs. Nature gave them a bunch of social and sexual advantage to compensate for their lack of resources. Now that they have resource and sex power, things are out of balance. We needs laws that prevent females from going to university or taking family supporting jobs from men. Our prisons are full of men who could not feed their families. The rape laws should be repealed. Females are artificially restricting the supply of available females in their reproductive years. Rape is the answer. Societies go to war over lack of females and jobs. Females have become a threat to society and must be put back in their place. Marc Lepine, you were ahead of your time.”
Well, this is my last video, it all has to come to this. Tomorrow is the day of retribution, the day in which I will have my revenge against humanity, against all of you. For the last eight years of my life, ever since I hit puberty, I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection and unfulfilled desires all because girls have never been attracted to me. Girls gave their affection, and sex and love to other men but never to me.
I’m 22 years old and I’m still a virgin. I’ve never even kissed a girl. I’ve been through college for two and a half years, more than that actually, and I’m still a virgin. It has been very torturous. College is the time when everyone experiences those things such as sex and fun and pleasure. Within those years, I’ve had to rot in loneliness. It’s not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me. I don’t know why you girls aren’t attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it. It’s an injustice, a crime, because … I don’t know what you don’t see in me. I’m the perfect guy and yet you throw yourselves at these obnoxious men instead of me, the supreme gentleman.
Here’s an example of a meme made by an avowed Incel. Ugh.
Spurned advances provoked Texas school shooting, victim’s mother says
SANTA FE, Texas (Reuters) – A teenage boy charged with fatally shooting eight students and two teachers during a gun rampage at a Houston-area high school had been spurned by one of his victims after making aggressive advances, her mother told a newspaper. Sadie Rodriguez, the mother of Shana Fisher, 16, who was killed in the attack, told the Los Angeles Times that her daughter rejected four months of aggressive advances from Dimitrios Pagourtzis, 17, who is in jail accused of murdering 10 people early on Friday at the high school in Santa Fe.
“…Being a diagnozed spaz, My son was really bad at masturbating, you bitches should have at least offered a hand. I am not demanding you whores give my son anal or anything. Just some wrist action a few times a week? Is that just too much to ask?…”
On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy”
My motivated critics couldn’t contain their joyful glee this week at discovering my hypothetical support for a Handmaid’s Tale-type patriarchal social structure as (let’s say) hinted at in Nellie Bowles’ New York Times article presenting her take on my ideas. It’s been a truism among anthropologists and biologically-oriented psychologists for decades that all human societies face two primary tasks: regulation of female reproduction (so the babies don’t die, you see) and male aggression (so that everyone doesn’t die). The social enforcement of monogamy happens to be an effective means of addressing both issues, as most societies have come to realize (pair-bonded marriages constituting, as they do, a human universal (see the list of human universals here, derived from Donald Brown’s book by that name). Here’s something intelligent about the issue, written by antiquark2 on reddit (after the NYT piece appeared and produced its tempest in a tea pot): “Peterson is using well-established anthropological language here: “enforced monogamy” does not mean government-enforced monogamy. “Enforced monogamy” means socially-promoted, culturally-inculcated monogamy, as opposed to genetic monogamy – evolutionarily-dictated monogamy, which does exist in some species (but does not exist in humans). This distinction has been present in anthropological and scientific literature for decades.”
Angry white man: “I am angry! I used to have meaning, and privilege. In the olden days I had a good income, and I was necessary. My generation fought against the German Fascists, and we had so much privilege we could get good pay, enough to have a wife be grateful we chose them. But now negroes and sexual deviants and women make more money than us. My son now wears a dress and lipstick and has a relationship with a black guy. My wife has divorced me because of my erectile dysfunction, and is living with her lesbian wife. I am mad as hell and I am not going to take this any more! Trump! Trump! Trump!”
Bored rich man: “What do I care. I have done business, and quite good business, with chinese executives, russian oligarchs, african warlords european degenerates. I have extensively experimented with all forms of narcotics and sexuality. I have a BDSM Mistress and by wives know and find it perfectly fine. I trade in facebook IPO shares and bitcoins and I make more money than the utterly de-unionized workers in my highly automated departments. Why should I continue to care about you, when you refuse all modernity and progress. You don’t even know what’s happening, you just keep on watching TV, go to football and NASCAR. You are stuck in a bygone age, blind to the real world. Why would I care for you? I am a modern human being, I read Kurzweil and DeGaris and I go on vacation to Ibiza and Amsterdam and Bangkok six times a year. What do I care about your pallid skin pigmentation? What do I care about your sense of materialist and sexual entitlement? What do I care about your vote ? You were asleep as the world passed you buy. You quit unions and you voted Trump – Trump who has been an errant boy of the manhattan upper class west side for decades, groveling in our footsteps. What did you expect? You squandered your rights decades ago, and did nothing. You refused a proper education and curled up in idiotic irrelevance in your church. Why am I to give a damn as I get workers in China for one tenth your labour costs? Go away you fool, you mean nothing to me. Return to your pathetic fly over trailer park and accept your irrelevance and imminent death with grace and dignity. You did this to yourself. Security Please! Please escort this man out and be sure to throw him on the pavement hard. ”
TOO MANY MEN – ★
In China and India, men outnumber women by 70 million. Both nations are belatedly trying to come to grips with the policies that created this male-heavy generation. Nothing like this has happened in human history. A combination of cultural preferences, government decree and modern medical technology in the world’s two largest countries has created a gender imbalance on a continental scale. Men outnumber women by 70 million in China and India. The consequences of having too many men, now coming of age, are far-reaching: Beyond an epidemic of loneliness, the imbalance distorts labor markets, drives up savings rates in China and drives down consumption, artificially inflates certain property values, and parallels increases in violent crime, trafficking or prostitution in a growing number of locations.
American Hyper-Capitalism Breeds the Lonely, Alienated Men Who Become Mass Killers ★
This is it, the mess we are in, in a (wing)nutshell.
Rallying MRA, MGTOW, neomasculinists, and alt-right under a single cause.
From my understanding, MGTOW, MRA, alt-right and neomasculinists have one overlap – they are all a result of unchecked female hypergamy and rights that used to be regulated prior to the 1900’s. Neomasculinists improve themselves through game/money/fitness/circumstances to elevate themselves to men in the top 20% of desired female sexual selection, get laid (and tend to have offspring). MGTOW’s that are in the bottom 80% so they simply check out of society that does not give them a stake (progeny) to work towards. Alt-right resulted from cucked political decision that came from women voting in socialist and pro-immigration laws. MRA’s want laws to be fair toward men but it just falls of deaf ears. There is no way any of these groups will see eye to eye on anything or so I thought. What if these groups can commit themselves to end female suffrage? Surely this is something actionable all groups can agree with. This idea is not as fringe as I used to believe. Samseau mentioned in another thread that 80% of alt-right already agree to it and with the internet I think the political landscape can change very quickly despite how unrealistic many may believe it to be. This is an issue that ought to brought up and discussed.
ISIS Tactics Have Spread to Other Violent Actors
Yesterday’s headline writers took the afternoon off, it seems, and engaged the newsroom’s cliché machine: A van “plowed” into crowds on Toronto’s Yonge Street, killing at least 10 and wounding several. That many readers no longer blanch at this agricultural metaphor—indeed they expect it—is a mark of how far the technique of mass vehicular homicide has spread. The alleged driver does not appear to have anything to do with the Islamic State, with whom the technique is now most associated. But of course we all waited (or rather, some of us did) to discover whether his name was Muslim, and we were ready to deploy our opinions to the crime scene, depending on the result.
Jordan Peterson, Custodian of the Patriarchy ★
Wherever he goes, he speaks in sermons about the inevitability of who we must be. “You know you can say, ‘Well isn’t it unfortunate that chaos is represented by the feminine’ — well, it might be unfortunate, but it doesn’t matter because that is how it’s represented. It’s been represented like that forever. And there are reasons for it. You can’t change it. It’s not possible. This is underneath everything. If you change those basic categories, people wouldn’t be human anymore. They’d be something else. They’d be transhuman or something. We wouldn’t be able to talk to these new creatures.”
Why the “Redistribution of Sex” is a Tale Told By Idiots
This is going to an ugly, disturbing essay. I apologise. I don’t like wading into the filthy waters of American discourse. In this case, Ross Douthat, that fine young cannibal, arguing for the “redistribution of sex” — something that fringe right wing intellectuals in the States think is a thing. It is not a thing. Shame on my fellow economists and intellectuals for not debunking it more swiftly. They haven’t, or perhaps can’t, because American thought is barely able to think at all anymore, so let me.
Men Don’t Have a Right to Sex
Not everyone is going to have sex. Many people are, though. A study from 2007 indicates that 99 percent of Americans will have had sex by the age of 44. Accordingly, it’s hard to say we’re experiencing a crisis of sexlessness, but, okay, that leaves one percent of the population who will not. That’s okay. They can go on—and doubtless most of that one percent do go on—to enjoy other fun and rewarding hobbies. They can devote their energies to projects and philosophies that better themselves and those around them. This should not be hard to imagine because, while for many of us, sex is an extremely enjoyable part of life, it is just one of the many enjoyable parts of life. (It was Billy Joel who once said “a peanut butter and jelly sandwich is better than bad sex”.)
Just look at what these people say, without a moment of hesitation.
Listening to this nutter it becomes clear. there is no reconciliation possible. This level of hatred will lead to either side having to exterminate and destroy the other, by whatever means available. This is incitement and hate speech, and should be treated like that in court.